System and method for ue-specific offloading

ABSTRACT

An apparatus is configured to perform a method for user equipment (UE) offloading. The method includes receiving, at a network controller, a measurement report from a UE, the measurement report radio link measurement quantities of a serving cell and one or more candidate serving cells, the measurement quantities measured after interference cancellation or suppression. The method also includes, based in part on the measurement report from the UE, determining whether to offload the UE to a second cell among the one or more candidate serving cells.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S) AND CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 61/955,606, filed Mar. 19, 2014,entitled “UE-SPECIFIC OFFLOADING”, U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationNo. 61/972,965, filed Mar. 31, 2014, entitled “ADAPTIVE CIO ANDUE-SPECIFIC OFFLOADING”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/659,260filed Mar. 16, 2015, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UE-SPECIFICOFFLOADING” each of which are hereby incorporated by reference into thisapplication as if fully set forth herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to wireless communicationnetworks including heterogeneous networks and universal mobiletelecommunications system (UMTS) user equipment (UE), and moreparticularly, to systems and methods for offloading and cell individualoffset (CIO) adaption.

BACKGROUND

The deployment of heterogeneous networks (Hetnets), which include amixed deployment of high power NodeBs (macro cells) and low power nodes(LPNs), aims at increasing network capacity and coverage. Load imbalanceis a common issue in network deployment, especially for Hetnets. Forexample, the LPN generally transmits with low power, causing thecoverage of the LPN to be limited. Additionally, the LPN cannot alwaysbe deployed in the center of a hotspot area. These two factors can leadto a lightly loaded LPN and an overloaded macro cell. Load balancingtechniques can be used to improve network capacity and user experience.However, many of the load balancing techniques are less than optimal.

SUMMARY

According to one embodiment, there is provided a method for userequipment (UE) offloading. The method includes receiving, at a networkcontroller, a measurement report from a UE, the measurement report radiolink measurement quantities of a serving cell and one or more candidateserving cells, the measurement quantities measured after interferencecancellation or suppression. The method also includes, based in part onthe measurement report from the UE, determining whether to offload theUE to a second cell among the one or more candidate serving cells.

According to another embodiment, there is provided a method for UEoffloading at a UE. The method includes performing, at the UE, one ormore measurements associated with radio link performance of a servingcell and one or more candidate serving cells. The method also includestransmitting, by the UE, a measurement report to a network controller,the measurement report comprising the one or more measurementsassociated with the radio link performance of the serving cell and theone or more candidate serving cells. The measurement report isconfigured to be used at the network controller to determine whether tooffload the UE to a second cell among the one or more candidate servingcells.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, and theadvantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptionstaken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein likenumbers designate like objects, and in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example heterogeneous network (Hetnet);

FIG. 2 illustrates another example Hetnet;

FIG. 3 illustrates the measurement model as in FIG. 7 in 3GPP TS 25.302;

FIG. 4 illustrates a workflow diagram of an example process formeasurement reporting and UE-specific CIO adaptation and offloadingaccording to this disclosure;

FIG. 5 illustrates a workflow diagram of another example process formeasurement reporting and UE-specific CIO adaptation and offloadingaccording to this disclosure;

FIG. 6 illustrates an example communication system that may be used forimplementing the devices and methods disclosed herein; and

FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate example devices that may be used forimplementing the methods and teachings disclosed herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIGS. 1 through 7B, discussed below, and the various embodiments used todescribe the principles of the present invention in this patent documentare by way of illustration only and should not be construed in any wayto limit the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art willunderstand that the principles of the invention may be implemented inany type of suitably arranged device or system.

Embodiments of this disclosure are directed to the offloading of UEsfrom one cell to another cell that generally has a lower load. Thedecision to offload is based on the traffic load of the serving cell andthe candidate serving cells, and the UE link level performancedifference before and after offloading. The traffic load may be known bythe network. The UE link level performance can be closely related to theUE receiver capability and radio link conditions. The UE reports to thenetwork the radio link conditions from the current serving cell and fromthe neighbor candidate-serving cell(s). Based on the traffic load and UEreports of the radio link conditions, the network offloads the UE to anew cell by setting a UE-specific cell individual offset (CIO) ordirectly triggering the offloading procedure. While the disclosedembodiments are described in conjunction with heterogeneous networks(i.e., networks having NodeBs with different transmit powers), it willbe understood that the disclosed embodiments are also applicable tohomogeneous networks (i.e., networks having NodeBs with substantiallythe same transmit powers).

FIG. 1 illustrates an example heterogeneous network (Hetnet) 100. AHetnet is a mixed deployment of high power NodeBs (macro cells) and lowpower nodes (LPNs) configured to increase the network capacity andcoverage. As shown in FIG. 1, the Hetnet 100 includes a macro NodeB 110serving a coverage area 115, and a LPN 120 serving a coverage area 125.In Hetnets, UEs can be offloaded from the macro cell to the LPN and canenjoy higher data rates. System capacity and coverage gains comeprimarily from the enhanced scheduling opportunities provided by theLPN. Therefore, offloading more UEs to be served by a LPN can beimportant in Hetnet deployments.

In Hetnets, the difference in transmit power between a macro NodeB and aLPN causes different coverage areas for the uplink (UL) and the downlink(DL); this is generally referred to as UL-DL imbalance. The downlinkcoverage is determined by the transmit power of each node, and hightransmit power nodes cover larger areas than low transmit power nodes.For example, in FIG. 1, the coverage area 115 of the macro NodeB 110 islarger than the coverage area 125 of the LPN 120. Serving cell selectionis based on the downlink received signal strength. If the CellIndividual Offset (CIO) of the serving cell change is configured at 0dB, event 1D for cell change (described below) is reported when the UEis positioned where the downlink signal powers from the macro NodeB andthe LPN are the same. At that position, the uplink signal received atthe macro NodeB is much weaker than the signal received at the LPN, orequivalently the path loss from the UE to the macro NodeB is larger thanthe path loss from the UE to the LPN. Thus, the UE position with equaluplink path loss and the UE position with equal downlink received powerare different; the region between such positions is referred to as theimbalance region.

Cell range expansion (CRE) is a technique to expand the coverage area ofLPNs and impacts the offloading operation. With CRE, the CIO at the LPNis set to a value higher than zero. This expands the coverage area ofthe LPN, as indicated by the expanded coverage area 128 in FIG. 1. Then,with CRE in use, in the area where the UE originally was served by themacro cell (e.g., in FIG. 1, the area outside the coverage area 125 butinside the expanded coverage area 128), the UE will instead be offloadedto the LPN. This area is referred to as the CRE area. In order tooffload more UEs to be served by the LPN, the CRE area should beenlarged. One typical technique to enlarge the CRE area includesconfiguring a larger handover biasing parameter.

As defined in 3GPP 25.331, the serving cell change procedure isinitiated by a defined event 1D. An event 1D will be triggered for oneUE when the following condition is satisfied:

10·Log M _(NotBest) CIO _(NotBest)≧10·Log M _(Best) +CIO _(Best) +H_(1d)/2,  (1)

where M_(NotBest) is the measurement result of a cell which is not theserving cell of the UE, CIO_(NotBest) is the cell individual offset ofthis specified cell, M_(Best) is the measurement result of the servingcell of the UE, CIO_(Best) is the cell individual offset of the servingcell of the UE, and H_(1d) is the hysteresis parameter for the event 1D.

The CIO parameter can be configured by radio resource control (RRC)signaling from the radio network controller (RNC) or by systeminformation block (SIB) information from the serving NodeB. Oneindividual CIO is configured for one individual cell (CIO_(Best)). Oncethe event 1D is triggered, the UE sends a measurement report thatincludes the measurement results to the RNC. Based on this measurementreport (related to M_(Best)), the RNC determines whether the UE shouldhand over (be offloaded) to the specified NotBest cell that satisfiesequation (1).

According to the serving cell change procedure described above, it canbe seen that in UMTS the range expansion can be achieved by using alarger CIO_(NotBest) parameter. In some Hetnet deployments, the networkcan use a larger CIO parameter for the LPN cell (identified asCIO_(LPN)), in which case the UE will be more inclined to hand over tothe LPN (in high-speed downlink packet access (HSDPA), the handover iscalled serving cell change). Therefore, more UEs will be offloaded tothe LPN, which can improve the system capacity and coverage performancefor Hetnets.

By applying a large CIO parameter to offload the UE to an unloaded orlightly loaded cell, the CRE technique can provide a benefit to thenetwork capacity and coverage. However, the CRE technique may notimprove the performance of the offloaded UE. There are a number offactors impacting the UE performance when offloading is applied. Onefactor is an increase in scheduling resources or opportunities from thenew NodeB if the new serving cell is unloaded or lightly loaded comparedwith the previous cell. Another factor is radio link degradation. Thatis, the offloaded UEs may suffer from a worse serving link compared withthe previous serving link. This can be due to a strong interferingsignal from the neighboring cell (which can be the previous serving cellbefore offloading).

An example is shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 2 illustrates another example Hetnet200 that include a macro NodeB 210 and a LPN 220 communicatively coupledto a RNC 230. The Hetnet 200 also includes one or more UEs representedby the UE 240. As shown in FIG. 2, the macro NodeB 210 is overloaded andthe LPN 220 is unloaded or lightly loaded. This can be a typicalscenario in Hetnet deployments. In this scenario, before offloading, theUE 240 experiences a better downlink radio link from the serving cell(the macro NodeB 210); however, the UE 240 is rarely scheduled due tothe limited scheduling resources on the macro NodeB 210. Afteroffloading, the offloaded UE 240 can be scheduled with more schedulingtransmission time intervals (TTIs); however, the data that could beconveyed on each scheduled TTI may be degraded due to a worse radio linkfrom the new serving cell (the LPN 220).

The supported data rate in each TTI (or more generally, the link levelperformance of the UE 240) is impacted not only by the radio linkcondition but also by the receiver capabilities of the UE 240. A UE withmore powerful receiver processing, such as found in an interferencecancellation receiver, can support larger data rates compared with lesspowerful receivers under the same radio link condition.

Depending on the presence of other UEs with different receivers in theHetnet 200, the offloading operation of the UE 240 may have a differentimpact on the UE 240 and overall system performance. Hence, it isobserved that the cell-specific offloading/CIO adaptation solution doesnot always guarantee the best performance in a realistic deployment.

The decision to offload a specific UE can be based on the load of thecurrent serving cell and the candidate new serving cells, and the linklevel performance difference before and after offloading. The load isknown by the network. The link level performance is closely related tothe UE receiver capability and radio link condition, which, in mostlegacy networks, is only known by the UE. In order to improve theoffloading decision, the network should also have knowledge of the radiolink conditions in the candidate neighbor serving cells. This is notsupported in current networks.

To address these issues, embodiments of this disclosure provide methodsand systems to allow the network to perform UE-specific offloading andCIO adaptation. In the disclosed embodiments, the link level performancedifference before offloading (where the UE is served in the currentserving cell) and after offloading (where the UE is served in one of thecandidate neighbor serving cells) can be indicated to the network side.

To achieve this, embodiments of this disclosure define signaling toindicate the link level performance difference if offloading would beapplied to the UE. In some embodiments, the signaling can include a newmeasurement report that indicates the link level performance of theserving cell and candidate neighbor serving cells. In some embodiments,the measurement report includes legacy measurement quantities, such asreceived signal code power (RSCP) and received signal strength indicator(RSCP/RSSI). In addition to (or instead of) legacy measurementquantities (such as RSCP and RSCP/RSSI), the measurement report caninclude metrics that reflect the link level performance difference. Oneexample metric, CQI_candidate, is described below.

Given the above measurements, the network can decide whether to offloadthe UE based on one or more of the following aspects:

Link level evaluation: The UE position could be obtained from the legacyRSCP measurements. The link quality difference after offloading can beevaluated from the difference between the CQIs of the serving cell andneighbor cells.

Scheduling resource gain evaluation: The resource usage is known by theRNC or other network entity. The network can evaluate how much gain inscheduling resources could be obtained for the UE if the UE is offloadedto the new cell.

Once the decision to offload is made, the offloading procedure can beperformed by (1) directly triggering the handover procedure by usinglegacy RRC signaling, (2) configuring a UE-specific CIO on the UEthrough legacy RRC signaling, or (3) another suitable method.

The disclosed embodiments feature a new measurement of radio link levelperformance, CQI_candidate, from candidate neighbor cells; a method toconfigure the UE to perform measurements on the candidate neighbor cellset, and one or more triggering events for the new measurement report,as described in greater detail below. The network decision to offloadcan be based on both the legacy measurements and the new measurements.

Measurement Report to Indicate Link Level Performance

In some embodiments, a new measurement of radio link level performanceis defined and configured on the UE side. Using the new measurement,measurement quantities reflecting the link level performance of the datachannel can be evaluated for the serving cell and one or more candidateneighbor serving cells. A new measurement report can be used to reportthe new measurement. The measurement report can include measurementsthat reflect the difference between link level performances in theserving cell and the candidate neighbor serving cells. The measurementreport can also optionally include legacy measurements, such as RSCP,RSCP/RSSI, and energy per chip over noise (Ec/No).

The new measurement, which is referred to as CQI_candidate, can bedefined as a Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) value from a candidateneighbor cell. The definition of CQI_candidate is similar to thedefinition in Section 6A.2 in 3GPP TS 25.214. For example, Section 6A.2states, “Based on an unrestricted observation interval, the UE shallreport the highest tabulated CQI value for which a single HS-DSCHsub-frame formatted with the transport block size, number of HS-PDSCHcodes and modulation corresponding to the reported or lower CQI valuecould be received with a transport block error probability not exceeding0.1 in a 3-slot reference period ending 1 slot before the start of thefirst slot in which the reported CQI value is transmitted.” In thisdisclosure, instead of being an estimation of CQI for a serving cell (asdefined in Section 6A.2), CQI_candidate is an estimate of CQI for anon-serving cell (i.e., the candidate neighbor cell). This layermeasurement is filtered according to the standardized model illustratedin FIG. 7 in Section 9.1 of 3GPP TS 25.302, which is shown in FIG. 3 ofthis disclosure. After layer 3 filtering, a long term CQI estimate forthe candidate neighbor cell is obtained. The long term CQI estimate isreferred to as LCQI_candidate. The measurement model is already definedin Section 9.1 of 3GPP TS 25.302 and can be applied here using themeasurements performed on the non-serving candidate neighbor cell links.

The legacy CQI from the serving cell is also filtered using the samefiltering technique as for the CQI from the candidate neighbor cell.After layer 3 filtering, a long term CQI estimate is obtained. The longterm CQI estimate for the serving cell is referred to as LCQI_serving.

In some embodiments, the UE sends the filtered values, LCQI_serving andLCQI_candidate, to the RNC when a measurement event is triggered. TheRNC estimates the UE link level performance difference when the UE isserved by the current serving cell and when the UE could be served bythe candidate neighbor cell. One way is to calculate the differencebetween the two long term CQIs and compare the difference to apredefined threshold.

In some embodiments, the UE performs the filtering of the long term CQIestimates from the serving and neighbor cells, and estimates thedifference between the two CQI values. Then the UE sends the differencevalue to the RNC.

A list of candidate neighbor cells can be configured for the new definedmeasurement CQI_candidate. The intent of configuring the candidateneighbor cell list is to reduce the overhead on the UE. By using thelist, the UE can avoid unnecessary post-IC measurement for non-candidatecells. Only the candidate cells which the UE can access and may handover to are configured as a member of the candidate list. The candidateneighbor cell list can be restricted to a set of neighbor cells that arelightly loaded and are good candidate cells for offloading. As anexample, in some Hetnet systems, only the LPNs covered by the macro cellcan be configured for measuring CQI_candidate. As another example, insome Hetnet systems, only CQI_candidate from the strongest neighbor cellis measured. As yet another example, in some homogeneous networks, asix-sector deployment is used on some NodeBs. In this scenario, more UEslocate in the edge area between two neighboring sectors on the sameNodeB. For these UEs, the RNC can include the neighbor cells of thecurrent serving cell into the candidate neighbor cell list, and use RRCsignaling to request the UE to measure the post-IC measurements (e.g.,long term CQI) of the cells in the candidate neighbor cell list.

As an example, when the RNC uses a measurement control message toconfigure a UE to do post-IC measurements (e.g., long term CQI), aninformation element (IE) is used to indicate a neighbor cell list to theUE. The cells in the neighbor cell list are the candidate cells that canbe accessed by the UE. One example is the neighbor cells on the sameNodeB and the LPN cells covered by the serving cell.

Once measurements have been taken, the measurements can be reported tothe network (e.g., the RNC) in a measurement report as described herein.The measurement report can be transmitted in response to differentoccurrences. In some embodiments, the measurement report can betransmitted in response to an occurrence of a predetermined event ortrigger. In other embodiments, the measurement report can be transmittedaccording to a predetermined schedule (i.e., periodically).

In embodiments where the measurement report is transmitted in responseto a predetermined event or trigger, the trigger can be based on thefollowing equation:

f ₁(M _(candidate))−f ₂(M _(serving))≧f ₃(z1,z2, . . . )  (1)

where M_(candidate) is the measurement result for a candidate cell whichis not the current serving cell, M_(serving) is the measurement resultfor the current serving cell, f₁(M_(candidate)) and f₂(M_(serving)) arefunctions of M_(candidate) and M_(serving), respectively, f₃(z1, z2, . .. ) is function of z1, z2, . . . , depending on the number of variables,and z1, z2, . . . are different parameters that can change depending onthe embodiment, as described in the examples below.

In a first example, Equation 1 can be represented by the followingequation:

10·Log M _(candidate)≧10·Log M _(serving)−Threshold1,  (2)

where M_(candidate) is the measurement result for the candidate cell,M_(serving) is the measurement result for the current serving cell, andThreshold1 is a threshold parameter or value configured by the network.

The measurements M_(candidate) and M_(serving) reflect the link levelperformance for the related data channels. Hence, by comparingM_(candidate) and M_(serving), the link level performance difference canbe evaluated if the UE is assumed to be offloaded from the serving cellto the candidate cell.

When the difference between M_(candidate) and M_(serving) is below thethreshold Threshold1, it can be assumed that the link level performancewill not be substantially degraded after the UE is offloaded from theserving cell to the candidate cell. In this case, the UE could beoffloaded to the candidate cell to provide more scheduling resources.Hence, once Equation 2 is fulfilled for a specified duration (referredto as Time to Trigger), the measurements are sent by the UE to the RNCin a measurement report.

In a second example, Equation 1 can be represented by the followingequation:

10·Log M _(candidate) +CIO _(candidate)≧10·Log M _(Serving) +CIO_(serving) +H _(1d)/2,  (3)

where M_(candidate) is the measurement result for the candidate cell,CIO_(candidate) is the long term CQI individual offset (LCIO) of thecandidate cell, M_(serving) is the measurement result for the currentserving cell; CIO_(Serving) is the long term CIO of the current servingcell, and H_(1d) is a hysteresis parameter for the event.

The measurements M_(candidate) and M_(serving) reflect the link levelperformance for the related data channels. Hence, by comparingM_(candidate) and M_(serving), the link level performance difference canbe evaluated if the UE is assumed to be offloaded from the serving cellto the candidate cell.

When the difference between M_(serving) and M_(candidate) is below apredetermined threshold, it can be assumed that the link levelperformance will not be substantially degraded after the UE is offloadedfrom the serving cell to the candidate cell. In this case, the UE couldbe offloaded to the candidate cell to provide more scheduling resources.Hence, once Equation 3 is fulfilled for a specified duration (e.g., Timeto Trigger), the measurements are sent by the UE to the RNC in ameasurement report.

As stated earlier, in some embodiments, the measurement report can betransmitted according to a predetermined periodical reporting schedule.A reporting interval T can be configured and provided to the UE in ameasurement control message. Once the UE is aware of the reportinginterval T, the UE can send the measurement report to the RNCperiodically according to the reporting interval T. In some embodiments,periodic reporting can be initiated after event-triggered reporting. Forexample, in some cases after event-triggered reporting occurs, the UEmay be located at a cell edge. For a cell-edge UE, the channelconditions from the serving cell and candidate cells might change again,and the conditions for a cell change could be met. In such a scenario,periodic reporting may help the RNC with the decision to offload.

FIG. 4 illustrates a workflow diagram of an example process formeasurement reporting and UE-specific CIO adaptation and offloadingaccording to this disclosure. The process 400 may be performed in theHetnet 100, Hetnet 200, or any other suitable system.

At operation 401, the RNC transmits a measurement control message to theUE to configure one or more measurements to be performed by the UE thatreflect the difference between link level performances in the servingcell and the candidate neighbor serving cells. The one or moremeasurements can include one or more CQI_candidate values, long term CQIvalues, LCQI_candidate values, filtered CQI values, other suitablemeasurement values, or a combination of two or more of these.

At operation 403, based on the measurement configuration received fromthe RNC, the UE performs the one or more measurements.

At operation 405, after an occurrence of a trigger event, the UEtransmits a measurement report to the RNC. The trigger event can be oneof the trigger events described above. The measurement report caninclude the measurements taken in operation 403, including measuredquantities of the serving cell and one or more candidate neighbor cells.If legacy measurement quantities are also included in the measurementreport, the RNC can estimate the position of the UE between the originalserving cell and the target candidate offloading cell. Hence thegeometry difference can also be evaluated and a proper CIO value can bechosen for offloading for the UE.

Once the new measurement report is received, the RNC evaluates themeasurement data in the measurement report and determines whether tooffload the UE. This can include the following operations 407, 409, and411.

At operation 407, based on the LCQI_candidate values reported in themeasurement report, the RNC performs a link level degradationevaluation. In the evaluation, the RNC assumes the UE is offloaded fromthe serving cell to the candidate neighbor cell, and then compares thereported LCQI_candidate values. Based on the comparison, the RNC canevaluate how much link level performance difference will be introducedif the UE's serving cell is changed to one of the candidate cells.

For example, when the difference between the LCQI_candidate values isbelow a predetermined threshold (Threshold2), the RNC determines thatthe link level performance loss will be within a specified range orpercentage after the UE is offloaded to the corresponding candidatecell. As a particular example, the link level performance can bemeasured or defined by the transport block size (TBS), which can beconveyed upon the data channel between the investigated cell and the UEassuming that some specified BLER_(target) (a target block error ratethat is predetermined at the RNC) is achieved. By evaluating the linklevel degradation, the RNC can estimate how much link level performanceloss can be expected assuming the UE is offloaded to the candidate cellin the reported neighbor cell list.

At operation 409, the RNC evaluates how much (or how many) schedulingresources can be gained once the UE is offloaded from the overloadedserving cell to a lightly loaded candidate neighbor cell. The loadingstatus on each NodeB (including both macro NodeBs and LPNs) is known bythe corresponding RNC in the network. In addition to the loading status,the scheduling principle on each NodeB is usually known by the RNC.Based on this information, the RNC can evaluate how much gain onscheduling resources could be obtained for the UE if the UE wereoffloaded to the candidate cell.

As an example, the scheduling resources for high-speed downlink packetaccess (HSDPA) can be measured by the number of available TTIs thatwould be scheduled or allocated to the UE. Alternatively, the averagenumber of additional high speed-physical downlink shared channel(HS-PDSCH) code resources available after offloading can be anotherconsideration in the evaluation of the gain on scheduling resources. Itwill be understood that other methods can be used for schedulingresources within the scope of this disclosure.

The RNC can perform the evaluations of operations 407 and 409 on eachcandidate cell in the cell list in the received measurement report.

At operation 411, the RNC decides whether to offload the UE to acandidate cell. Based on the evaluation results from operation 407 andoperation 409, the RNC knows from which candidate neighbor cell(s) theUE can obtain sufficient scheduling resources to overcome the link levelperformance degradation due to strong interference after offloading.Hence, the RNC can make the decision to offload the UE and then select acandidate cell as the offloading target cell. In making the decision tooffload the UE, the RNC can consider the objective of improving theoverall network capacity by offloading. The RNC can also consider theobjective of improving the throughput of the UE.

The order of operations 407, 409, and 411 can be rearranged according tothe specific implementation. As an example, two or more of theoperations can be performed substantially concurrently by the RNC.

If the RNC decides to offload the UE to the candidate cell, eitheroperation 413 or operation 415 is performed. Stated differently, eitherthe CIO adaptation signaling is triggered, meaning that a new CIO issent to the LPN, or the offloading procedure is initiated directly.

At operation 413, the RNC configures a UE-specific CIO parameter for theUE, and then transmits the UE-specific CIO parameter to the UE using RRCsignaling. The RNC uses RRC signaling to configure the UE-specific CIOparameter for a target LPN to ensure that the UE will be more likely tobe offloaded to the LPN.

Alternatively, at operation 415, the RNC initiates a handover/servingcell change procedure at the macro NodeB to offload the UE to the targetcandidate offloading cell.

In some embodiments, as an alternative to the CQI_candidate measurementdescribed above, the measurement for link level performance differencescan be ΔLCQI_(candidate), which is defined according to the following:

ΔLCQI_(candidate)=LCOI_(candidate)−LCQI_(serving),  (4)

where LCQI_(candidate) is the long term CQI for the candidate neighborcell (as described above), which is configured by the correspondingmeasurement control message; and LCQI_(serving) is the long term CQI forthe serving cell. The measurement ΔLCQI_(candidate) can be determinedfor each candidate cell. As an alternative definition, the measurementΔLCQI_(candidate) can be also defined according to the following:

ΔLCQI_(candidate)=LCQI_(serving)−LCQI_(candidate)  (5)

In embodiments where the measurement is ΔLCQI_(candidate) themeasurement report transmitted by the UE to the RNC can include a listof ΔLCQI_(candidate) values corresponding to the list of candidatecells, which is configured by corresponding measurement controlmessages. The measurement report can also optionally include legacymeasurements, such as RSCP, RSCP/RSSI and Ec/No.

FIG. 5 illustrates a workflow diagram of another example process formeasurement reporting and UE-specific CIO adaptation and offloadingaccording to this disclosure. The process 500 may be performed in theHetnet 100, Hetnet 200, or any other suitable system. Many of theoperations of the process 500 are the same as or similar tocorresponding operations of the process 400. Detailed descriptions ofthese operations will not be repeated here.

At operation 501, the RNC transmits a measurement control message to theUE to configure one or more measurements to be performed by the UE. Atoperation 503, the UE performs the one or more measurements.

At operation 505, after an occurrence of a trigger event, the UEtransmits a measurement report to the RNC. Like the measurement reporttransmitted in operation 405 in FIG. 4, the transmission of themeasurement report in operation 505 is event-triggered. However, thetrigger event and the contents of the measurement report in operation505 are different than in operation 405. Here, the trigger event is anenhanced event 1D, and the measurement report is defined as an enhancedevent 1D report.

The enhanced event 1D takes into consideration a measurement for linklevel performance of the data channel, e.g., a long term CQI, instead ofthe traditional event 1D measurements, such as RSRP and Ec/No. However,in some embodiments, the reported measurements can include legacymeasurements, such as RSCP and Ec/No, in addition to long term CQI.

The format of the enhanced event 1D measurement report can reuse theformat of the legacy measurement report. Although the format of theenhanced event 1D measurement report is similar to a legacy report, theenhanced event 1D report is defined as a different type of report sothat the network is aware that this event is triggered by a differentevent-triggering condition (i.e., a long term CQI based enhanced event1D), not by the traditional triggering condition (i.e., the RSCP basedevent 1D). Additionally, a CIO value can also be reported to the networkin the measurement report.

Once the new measurement report is received, the RNC evaluates themeasurement data in the measurement report and determines whether tooffload the UE. This can include the following operations.

At operation 507, the RNC knows that the trigger condition for theenhanced event 1D is met. Based on this, the RNC knows that thedifference between the link level performance before and afteroffloading is within the range of a predetermined threshold(Threshold2).

At operation 509, the RNC evaluates how much (or how many) schedulingresources can be gained once the UE is offloaded from the overloadedserving cell to a lightly loaded candidate neighbor cell. At operation511, the RNC decides whether to offload the UE to a candidate cell. Ifthe RNC decides to offload the UE to the candidate cell, eitheroperation 513 (CIO adaptation signaling is triggered) or operation 515(offloading procedure is initiated directly) is performed.

In some embodiments, the UE is configured to report a capability toreceive control channels and/or data channels. This capability isreported to the RNC and is reported separately from the measurementreport. This capability can be defined in different ways. In oneexample, the UE capability can be defined as a maximum differencebetween the serving cell RSCP (or Ec/No) and the strongest neighbor cellRSCP (or Ec/No) that can be supported based on the UE capability toreceive control channels and/or data channels while maintaining acertain desired performance. In another example, the UE capability canbe defined as a minimum geometry value that can be supported based onthe UE capability to receive control channels and/or data channels whilemaintaining a certain desired performance. In yet another example, theUE capability can be defined as a minimum Ec/No value that can besupported based on the UE capability to receive control channels and/ordata channels while maintaining a certain desired performance. In stillanother example, the UE capability can be defined as a maximum CIO valuethat can be supported based on the UE capability to receive controlchannels and/or data channels while maintaining a certain desiredperformance.

In some embodiments, the UE may report the capability to receive controlchannels and/or data channels as part of the process 500. For example,at operation 505, when the enhanced event 1D trigger event is satisfied,the measurement report is transmitted as described above. However, whenthe enhanced event 1D trigger event is not satisfied, the UE can reportthe capability to receive control channels and/or data channels. In someembodiments, this reporting can occur when the enhanced event 1D triggerevent is not satisfied for the first time after the UE has changed itsserving cell, or after a certain period of time from the last servingcell change.

In other embodiments, the UE may report the capability to receivecontrol channels and/or data channels in response to the network sendinga triggering condition or request to the UE to report its capability.The UE sends the UE capability report to the network when the triggeringcondition is satisfied.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example communication system 600 that may be usedfor implementing the devices and methods disclosed herein. In general,the system 600 enables multiple wireless users to transmit and receivedata and other content. The system 600 may implement one or more channelaccess methods, such as code division multiple access (CDMA), timedivision multiple access (TDMA), frequency division multiple access(FDMA), orthogonal FDMA (OFDMA), or single-carrier FDMA (SC-FDMA). Insome embodiments, the system 600 may represent (or by represented by)the Hetnet systems 100 and 200 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.

In this example, the communication system 600 includes user equipment(UE) 610 a-610 c, radio access networks (RANs) 620 a-620 b, a corenetwork 630, a public switched telephone network (PSTN) 640, theInternet 650, and other networks 660. While certain numbers of thesecomponents or elements are shown in FIG. 6, any number of thesecomponents or elements may be included in the system 600.

The UEs 610 a-610 c are configured to operate and/or communicate in thesystem 600. For example, the UEs 610 a-610 c are configured to transmitand/or receive wireless signals or wired signals. Each UE 610 a-610 crepresents any suitable end user device and may include such devices (ormay be referred to) as a user equipment/device (UE), wirelesstransmit/receive unit (WTRU), mobile station, fixed or mobile subscriberunit, pager, cellular telephone, personal digital assistant (PDA),smartphone, laptop, computer, touchpad, wireless sensor, or consumerelectronics device.

The RANs 620 a-620 b here include base stations 670 a-670 b,respectively. Each base station 670 a-670 b is configured to wirelesslyinterface with one or more of the UEs 610 a-610 c to enable access tothe core network 630, the PSTN 640, the Internet 650, and/or the othernetworks 660. For example, the base stations 670 a-670 b may include oneor more of several well-known devices, such as a base transceiverstation (BTS), a Node-B (NodeB), an evolved NodeB (eNodeB), a HomeNodeB, a Home eNodeB, a site controller, an access point (AP), or awireless router, or a server, router, switch, or other processing entitywith a wired or wireless network.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 6, the base station 670 a forms part ofthe RAN 620 a, which may include other base stations, elements, and/ordevices. Also, the base station 670 b forms part of the RAN 620 b, whichmay include other base stations, elements, and/or devices. Each basestation 670 a-670 b operates to transmit and/or receive wireless signalswithin a particular geographic region or area, sometimes referred to asa “cell.” In some embodiments, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)technology may be employed having multiple transceivers for each cell.

The base stations 670 a-670 b communicate with one or more of the UEs610 a-610 c over one or more air interfaces 690 using wirelesscommunication links. The air interfaces 690 may utilize any suitableradio access technology.

It is contemplated that the system 600 may use multiple channel accessfunctionality, including such schemes as described above. In particularembodiments, the base stations and UEs are configured to implement theLong Term Evolution wireless communication standard (LTE), LTE Advanced(LTE-A), and/or LTE Broadcast (LTE-B). Of course, other multiple accessschemes and wireless protocols may be utilized.

The RANs 620 a-620 b are in communication with the core network 630 toprovide the UEs 610 a-610 c with voice, data, application, Voice overInternet Protocol (VoIP), or other services. Understandably, the RANs620 a-620 b and/or the core network 630 may be in direct or indirectcommunication with one or more other RANs (not shown). The core network630 may also serve as a gateway access for other networks (such as PSTN640, Internet 650, and other networks 660). In addition, some or all ofthe UEs 610 a-610 c may include functionality for communicating withdifferent wireless networks over different wireless links usingdifferent wireless technologies and/or protocols. In addition, some orall of the UEs 610 a-610 c and the base stations 670 a-670 b areconfigured for performing operations for measurement reporting andUE-specific CIO adaptation and offloading according to this disclosure,such as the processes 400 and 500 shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.

Although FIG. 6 illustrates one example of a communication system,various changes may be made to FIG. 6. For example, the communicationsystem 600 could include any number of UEs, base stations, networks, orother components in any suitable configuration.

FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate example devices that may implement themethods and teachings according to this disclosure. In particular, FIG.7A illustrates an example UE 610, and FIG. 7B illustrates an examplebase station 670. These components could be used in the system 600, theHetnet systems 100 and 200, or in any other suitable system. Thesecomponents could be used to perform operations for measurement reportingand UE-specific CIO adaptation and offloading according to thisdisclosure, such as the processes 400 and 500 shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the UE 610 includes at least one processing unit700. The processing unit 700 implements various processing operations ofthe UE 610. For example, the processing unit 700 could perform signalcoding, data processing, power control, input/output processing, or anyother functionality enabling the UE 610 to operate in the system 600.The processing unit 700 also supports the methods and teachingsdescribed in more detail above. Each processing unit 700 includes anysuitable processing or computing device configured to perform one ormore operations. Each processing unit 700 could, for example, include amicroprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, fieldprogrammable gate array, or application specific integrated circuit.

The UE 610 also includes at least one transceiver 702. The transceiver702 is configured to modulate data or other content for transmission byat least one antenna 704. The transceiver 702 is also configured todemodulate data or other content received by the at least one antenna704. Each transceiver 702 includes any suitable structure for generatingsignals for wireless transmission and/or processing signals receivedwirelessly. Each antenna 704 includes any suitable structure fortransmitting and/or receiving wireless signals. One or multipletransceivers 702 could be used in the UE 610, and one or multipleantennas 704 could be used in the UE 610. Although shown as a singlefunctional unit, a transceiver 702 could also be implemented using atleast one transmitter and at least one separate receiver.

The UE 610 further includes one or more input/output devices 706. Theinput/output devices 706 facilitate interaction with a user. Eachinput/output device 706 includes any suitable structure for providinginformation to or receiving information from a user, such as a speaker,microphone, keypad, keyboard, display, or touch screen.

In addition, the UE 610 includes at least one memory 708. The memory 708stores instructions and data used, generated, or collected by the UE610. For example, the memory 708 could store software or firmwareinstructions executed by the processing unit(s) 700 and data used toreduce or eliminate interference in incoming signals. Each memory 708includes any suitable volatile and/or non-volatile storage and retrievaldevice(s). Any suitable type of memory may be used, such as randomaccess memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), hard disk, optical disc,subscriber identity module (SIM) card, memory stick, secure digital (SD)memory card, and the like.

As shown in FIG. 7B, the base station 670 includes at least oneprocessing unit 750, at least one transmitter 752, at least one receiver754, one or more antennas 756, and at least one memory 758. Theprocessing unit 750 implements various processing operations of the basestation 670, such as signal coding, data processing, power control,input/output processing, or any other functionality. The processing unit750 can also support the methods and teachings described in more detailabove. Each processing unit 750 includes any suitable processing orcomputing device configured to perform one or more operations. Eachprocessing unit 750 could, for example, include a microprocessor,microcontroller, digital signal processor, field programmable gatearray, or application specific integrated circuit.

Each transmitter 752 includes any suitable structure for generatingsignals for wireless transmission to one or more UEs or other devices.Each receiver 754 includes any suitable structure for processing signalsreceived wirelessly from one or more UEs or other devices. Althoughshown as separate components, at least one transmitter 752 and at leastone receiver 754 could be combined into a transceiver. Each antenna 756includes any suitable structure for transmitting and/or receivingwireless signals. While a common antenna 756 is shown here as beingcoupled to both the transmitter 752 and the receiver 754, one or moreantennas 756 could be coupled to the transmitter(s) 752, and one or moreseparate antennas 756 could be coupled to the receiver(s) 754. Eachmemory 758 includes any suitable volatile and/or non-volatile storageand retrieval device(s).

Additional details regarding UEs 610 and base stations 670 are known tothose of skill in the art. As such, these details are omitted here forclarity.

In another embodiment, a network entity sends information to the UE sothat the UE would determine at least one candidate serving cell and theHS-DPCCH format to be used upon receiving the information. If thenetwork entity is RNC, then the information can be delivered via RRCsignaling. If the network entity is NodeB, then the information can bedelivered via physical layer signaling, e.g., HS-SCCH order. Theinformation can consist of at least one candidate serving cell, and theindication of HS-DPCCH format.

Upon reception of the information sent from the network entity, the UEwould derive the link measurement quantities from the serving cell andthe candidate serving cell(s) informed by the network entity. The linkmeasurement quantities will be sent from the UE to the NodeB viaHS-DPCCH with a certain type of HS-DPCCH format. If there is only onecandidate serving cell, one example of the HS-DPCCH format is SF-DC(Single Frequency-Dual Cell) format. As an example, in this format, thelink measurement quantity of the serving cell is carried on the secondslot in one HS-DPCCH subframe, and the link measurement quantity of thecandidate serving cell is carried on the third slot in the HS-DPCCHsubframe. The link measurement quantity of the serving cell shouldreflect the serving cell's downlink quality corresponding to a firstspecific period of time, e.g., the nearest downlink subframe based onthe serving cell's pilot timing before the HS-DPCCH is transmitted inthe uplink or a 3-slot reference period ending 1 slot before the startof the first slot in which the reported CQI value is transmitted. Thelink measurement quantity of the candidate serving cell should reflectthe candidate serving cell's downlink quality corresponding to a secondspecific period of time, e.g., the nearest downlink subframe based onthe candidate serving cell's pilot timing before the HS-DPCCH istransmitted in the uplink or a 3-slot reference period ending 1 slotbefore the start of the first slot in which the reported CQI value istransmitted. The first specific period of time and the second specificperiod of time could be either the same or not the same.

NodeB filters the link measurement quantities reported by the UE. NodeBreports the filtered link measurement quantities of the UE to the RNCvia Iub signaling.

-   -   Based on the received filtered link measurement quantities        associated to a UE, RNC determines the new serving cell to        transmit data to the UE.    -   RNC offloads the UE to the new serving cell. RNC notifies a        NodeB (the serving cell or the new serving cell) to send a        physical layer signaling including new serving cell indicator to        the UE. Upon receiving the physical layer signaling, the UE        configures the new serving cell as its new serving cell. NodeB        could also send an indication to the UE so that the UE chooses        the proper HS-DPCCH format, e.g., a format consists of multiple        link measurement quantities, or the format consists of only the        link measurement quantity from the new serving cell.

RNC sends the downlink data to the new serving cell, and the new servingcell sends the data to the UE.

Another embodiment of the solution for the offloading procedure can beperformed as following:

A network entity sends information to the UE so that the UE wouldmonitor and decode the data from current serving cell and the candidateserving cell for offloading. If the network entity is RNC, then theinformation can be delivered via RRC signaling. If the network entity isNodeB, then the information can be delivered via physical layersignaling, e.g., HS-SCCH order. The information can consist of at leastone candidate serving cell.

Upon reception of the information sent from the network entity, the UEwould derive the link measurement quantities from the serving cell andthe candidate serving cell(s) informed by the network entity. The linkmeasurement quantities will be sent from the UE to the NodeB viaHS-DPCCH with a certain type of HS-DPCCH format. If there is only onecandidate serving cell, one example of the HS-DPCCH format is SF-DC(Single Frequency-Dual Cell) format. As an example, in this format, thelink measurement quantity of the serving cell is carried on the secondslot in one HS-DPCCH subframe, and the link measurement quantity of thecandidate serving cell is carried on the third slot in the HS-DPCCHsubframe. The link measurement quantity of the serving cell shouldreflect the serving cell's downlink quality corresponding to a firstspecific period of time, e.g., the nearest downlink subframe based onthe serving cell's pilot timing before the HS-DPCCH is transmitted inthe uplink or a 3-slot reference period ending 1 slot before the startof the first slot in which the reported CQI value is transmitted. Thelink measurement quantity of the candidate serving cell should reflectthe candidate serving cell's downlink quality corresponding to a secondspecific period of time, e.g., the nearest downlink subframe based onthe candidate serving cell's pilot timing before the HS-DPCCH istransmitted in the uplink or a 3-slot reference period ending 1 slotbefore the start of the first slot in which the reported CQI value istransmitted. The first specific period of time and the second specificperiod of time could be either the same or not the same.

NodeB filters the link measurement quantities reported by the UE. NodeBreports the filtered link measurement quantities of the UE to the RNCvia Iub signaling.

RNC sends the downlink data to either the original serving cell or thecandidate serving cell for offloading according to the received filteredCQI and the load status on these two cells. Either one of the two cellswill send the received data to the UE accordingly when the UE's dataarrives.

In some embodiments, some or all of the functions or processes of theone or more of the devices are implemented or supported by a computerprogram that is formed from computer readable program code and that isembodied in a computer readable medium. The phrase “computer readableprogram code” includes any type of computer code, including source code,object code, and executable code. The phrase “computer readable medium”includes any type of medium capable of being accessed by a computer,such as read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), a hard diskdrive, a compact disc (CD), a digital video disc (DVD), or any othertype of memory.

It may be advantageous to set forth definitions of certain words andphrases used throughout this patent document. The terms “include” and“comprise,” as well as derivatives thereof, mean inclusion withoutlimitation. The term “or” is inclusive, meaning and/or. The phrases“associated with” and “associated therewith,” as well as derivativesthereof, mean to include, be included within, interconnect with,contain, be contained within, connect to or with, couple to or with, becommunicable with, cooperate with, interleave, juxtapose, be proximateto, be bound to or with, have, have a property of, or the like.

While this disclosure has described certain embodiments and generallyassociated methods, alterations and permutations of these embodimentsand methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly,the above description of example embodiments does not define orconstrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterationsare also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of thisdisclosure, as defined by the following claims.

1. A method for user equipment (UE) offloading, the method comprising:receiving, at a network controller, a measurement report from a UE, themeasurement report comprising radio link measurement quantities of atleast one of: a serving cell and one or more candidate serving cells,the measurement quantities measured after interference cancellation orsuppression; and based in part on the measurement report from the UE,determining, at the network controller, whether to offload the UE to asecond cell among the one or more candidate serving cells.
 2. The methodof claim 1, further comprising: offloading the UE to the second cell. 3.The method of claim 2, wherein offloading the UE to the second cellcomprises one of: configuring a cell individual offset (CIO) on the UEthrough radio resource control (RRC) signaling; triggering an offloadingprocedure through RRC signaling; or triggering an offloading procedurethrough physical layer signaling.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein themeasurement report includes one or more legacy measurement quantitiesindicating a received signal code power (RSCP) and a received signalstrength indicator (RSCP/RSSI).
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein themeasurement report includes at least one measurement quantity indicatinga difference between a link quality for one of the candidate servingcells and a link quality for the current serving cell.
 6. The method ofclaim 1, wherein at least one measurement quantity in the measurementreport comprises a long term channel quality indicator measurement. 7.The method of claim 1, wherein the serving cell is served by a NodeB andthe second cell is served by a low power node (LPN).
 8. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the serving cell and the second cell are served by thesame NodeB or by different NodeBs.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein themeasurement report by the UE is triggered by an occurrence of an event1D.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the measurement report istransmitted by the UE periodically according to a predeterminedschedule.
 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting ameasurement control message to the UE to configure one or moremeasurements to be performed by the UE on a link quality of the one ormore candidate serving cells.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein themeasurement report by the UE is triggered by an occurrence of anenhanced event 1D.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the enhancedevent 1D comprises a measurement of a long term channel qualityindicator (CQI).
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the enhanced event1D comprises a determination of a difference value between the linklevel performance of the serving cell and one of the candidate servingcells, and a comparison of the difference value with a predeterminedthreshold to determine to determine to trigger the enhanced event 1D.15. The method of claim 12, wherein the enhanced event 1D is configuredwith a predetermined threshold for link performance.
 16. The method ofclaim 1, wherein a list of candidate serving cells is indicated to theUE to perform radio link measurements.
 17. A method for user equipment(UE) offloading at a UE, the method comprising: performing, at the UE,one or more measurements associated with radio link performance of aserving cell and one or more candidate serving cells; and transmitting,by the UE, a measurement report to a network controller, the measurementreport comprising the one or more measurements associated with the radiolink performance of the serving cell and the one or more candidateserving cells; wherein the measurement report is configured to be usedat the network controller to determine whether to offload the UE to asecond cell among the one or more candidate serving cells.
 18. Themethod of claim 17, wherein the measurement report includes measurementsafter interference cancellation or suppression from the current servingcell and one of the candidate serving cells.
 19. The method of claim 17,wherein the measurement report includes one or more legacy measurementquantities indicating a received signal code power (RSCP) and a receivedsignal strength indicator (RSCP/RSSI).
 20. The method of claim 17,wherein the measurement report includes at least one measurementquantity indicating a difference between a link quality for one of thecandidate serving cells and a link quality for the current serving cell.21. The method of claim 17, wherein at least one measurement quantity inthe measurement report comprises a long term channel quality indicatormeasurement.
 22. The method of claim 17, wherein the serving cell isserved by a NodeB and the second cell is served by a low power node(LPN).
 23. The method of claim 17, wherein the second cell is served bya same NodeB that serves the serving cell.
 24. The method of claim 17,wherein the measurement report is transmitted by the UE in response toan occurrence of an event 1D.
 25. The method of claim 17, wherein themeasurement report is transmitted by the UE periodically according to apredetermined schedule.
 26. The method of claim 17, further comprising:receiving a measurement control message from the network controller,wherein the UE performs the one or more measurements in response toreceiving the measurement control message.
 27. The method of claim 17,wherein the UE transmits the measurement report in response to anoccurrence of an enhanced event 1D.
 28. The method of claim 27, whereinthe enhanced event 1D comprises a measurement of a long term channelquality indicator (CQI).
 29. The method of claim 27, wherein theenhanced event 1D comprises a determination of a difference valuebetween the link level performance of the serving cell and one of thecandidate serving cells, and a comparison of the difference value with apredetermined threshold to determine to trigger the enhanced event 1D.30. The method of claim 27, wherein the enhanced event 1D is configuredwith a predetermined threshold for link performance.
 31. The method ofclaim 17, wherein an information element (IE) is used to indicate a listof candidate serving cells to the UE.
 32. A network controller apparatusconfigured for user equipment (UE) offloading, the apparatus comprising:at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled to the at leastone memory, the at least one processor configured to: receive ameasurement report from a UE, the measurement report comprising radiolink conditions of a serving cell and one or more candidate servingcells; and based in part on the measurement report from the UE,determine whether to offload the UE to a second cell among the one ormore candidate serving cells.
 33. A user equipment (UE) apparatusconfigured for UE offloading, the apparatus comprising: at least onememory; and at least one processor coupled to the at least one memory,the at least one processor configured to: perform one or moremeasurements associated with radio link conditions of a serving cell andone or more candidate serving cells; and transmit a measurement reportto a network controller, the measurement report comprising the one ormore measurements associated with the radio link conditions of theserving cell and the one or more candidate serving cells; wherein themeasurement report is configured to be used at the network controller todetermine whether to offload the UE to a second cell among the one ormore candidate serving cells.
 34. A method comprising: transmitting auser equipment (UE) capability report to a network controller.
 35. Themethod of claim 34, wherein the UE capability report indicates acapability of the UE to receive control channels and/or data channels.36. The method of claim 34, further comprising: before transmitting theUE capability report, determining at least one of: a maximum differencebetween a received signal code power (RSCP) of the current serving celland the RSCP of a strongest neighbor cell; a minimum geometry value thatcan be supported by the UE to receive control channels and/or datachannels; a minimum energy per chip over noise (Ec/No) value that can besupported by the UE to receive control channels and/or data channels; ora maximum cell individual offset (CIO) value that can be supported. 37.The method of claim 36, wherein the UE reports to the network controllerat least one of the maximum difference, the minimum geometry value, theminimum Ec/No value, or the maximum CIO value.
 38. The method of claim16, wherein the list is sent to the UE via RRC signaling or physicallayer signaling.
 39. The method of claim 1, wherein the measurementquantities of the serving cell and the one or more candidate servingcells are carried on an uplink HS-DPCCH.
 40. The method of claim 39,wherein the network controller configures a HS-DPCCH format and aHS-DPCCH power to carry measurement quantities from the serving cell andthe one or more candidate serving cells.
 41. The method of claim 40,further comprising: a measurement quantity of the serving cellassociated to a downlink quality in a time period, wherein the timeperiod is the nearest downlink subframe based on the serving cell'spilot timing before the HS-DPCCH is transmitted in the uplink; and ameasurement quantity of at least one of the candidate serving cellsassociated to a downlink quality in a time period, wherein the timeperiod is the nearest downlink subframe based on the candidate servingcell's pilot timing before the HS-DPCCH is transmitted in the uplink.42. The method of claim 1, wherein a NodeB sends measurement quantitiesof the serving cell and at least one of the candidate serving cells fora UE to the network controller via Iub signaling.
 43. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising configuring the UE to activate or deactivatethe measurement quantities.
 44. The method of claim 43 wherein theactivation or deactivation is done through RRC signaling.
 45. The methodof claim 43 wherein the activation or deactivation is done throughphysical layer signaling.